09-Aug-2015: Shching-thump

Discuss the comic here!
User avatar
Sessine
Poorly Locked Patron
Poorly Locked Patron
Posts: 386

Re: 09-Aug-2015: Shching-thump

Post by Sessine » Tue Aug 11, 2015 4:59 pm

Arch Lich Burns wrote:But fists ARE a weapon and can be used as such. If intents matter then when punching someone they will be considered weapons and blind you.
I'd say you're overthinking it. Very much in the grand overthinking tradition of this forum, so applause, but...

It's called unarmed combat. Hands and feet are permanent parts of the body. They aren't separate devices. You can't set them aside and then pick them up again. So fists are not literally weapons -- only metaphorically so.

(I expect a prosthetic fist would count as a weapon, though.)
► Show Spoiler

User avatar
Zathyr
Smiths Silly Smiles
Posts: 3199
UStream Username: Zathyr

Re: 09-Aug-2015: Shching-thump

Post by Zathyr » Tue Aug 11, 2015 6:27 pm

But Thaco went blind (as in the blindfold worked like a blindfold) just touching the Axe of Prissan. He didn't even pick it up and it didn't look like he was intending to use it. Looked more like he was just resting his hand on the handle. :shrug:
Image And always make sure your dragons are happy little dragons.

User avatar
Xavier78
Pipes Up Sometimes
Posts: 191

Re: 09-Aug-2015: Shching-thump

Post by Xavier78 » Tue Aug 11, 2015 6:47 pm

HerdsCats wrote:
Kamos wrote:
Arch Lich Burns wrote:Ah but how can nothing be a weapon or be used as such? He is literally holding nothig...
Well with the description at hand I'd say it's more what you're thinking. The fact that you know and/or think of it as a weapon is what blinds you.
Pretty much this. It's your intent,and not what you hold (or don't hold) in your hand. Oblivious is sort of a strange thing, because although "technically it doesn't exist", it can still effect things, and Minmax still thinks of it as his weapon. Thus negating your argument. Oblivious exists because mimax says for it to exist. He believes it to be his weapon, just as I now believe my butter knife to be my weapon. Now get the hell away from my fries you moocher.
Correct me if I'm wrong but I remember it being mentioned that no one but Minmax can even move Oblivious because of what it is. By your argument, that wouldn't be possible because Minmax "makes it exist" thus negating the "technically not existing" part of the sword so therefor anyone could move it... I'm probably over thinking it though. :shock:

Also, that Axe can cut through stone way to easily, as I mentioned before. That bugs me to no end. :meh:

User avatar
jokespoorly
Mumbles Incoherently
Posts: 16

Re: 09-Aug-2015: Shching-thump

Post by jokespoorly » Tue Aug 11, 2015 8:39 pm

If Minmax makes a pirate's eyepatch with the cloth, he could at least gain a bonus when not holding Oblivious, right? Notwalter might be impressed (again).

He may be stupid, but he's unable to ignore the usefulness of a sophisticated adventuring tool...

JP

User avatar
Kamos
Pipes Up Sometimes
Posts: 169

Re: 09-Aug-2015: Shching-thump

Post by Kamos » Tue Aug 11, 2015 8:43 pm

Doesn't he have blind fighting in the very least? :lol:
Zathyr wrote:But Thaco went blind (as in the blindfold worked like a blindfold) just touching the Axe of Prissan. He didn't even pick it up and it didn't look like he was intending to use it. Looked more like he was just resting his hand on the handle. :shrug:
He still thinks it's a weapon while he's holding it, the only real qualifier for blindness. Which is why Minmax couldn't use it even if his sword is nothing. He still thinks he has a weapon.
The way I can see it is your hands and feet are just 'you', even when you attack you're hitting them with yourself. The axe and sword are 'weapons'. A kitchen knife is different in that's a 'tool' until you go to stab someone. Then, consciously or not, it becomes a 'weapon'.

Fun fact, even if it's not super relevant, 5th Edition actually released new errata going to great lengths to disqualify unarmed strikes from weapon status :P.
ImageImage Feed the beast please.

User avatar
YalaYalaGetDolla
Mutters to Themself
Posts: 29

Re: 09-Aug-2015: Shching-thump

Post by YalaYalaGetDolla » Tue Aug 11, 2015 10:35 pm

Krulle wrote:With the not very positive intent of hurting BE and satisfying oneself....
Doesn't it take like a month of bad deeds to release the demon? I think unless Ears let's Complains whale on him for several days straight they'll be fine. :lol:

User avatar
Krulle
Transcribes Goblins
Posts: 8119
Contact:

Re: 09-Aug-2015: Shching-thump

Post by Krulle » Tue Aug 11, 2015 11:22 pm

non-body-parts-weapons...?
Goblinscomic transcriptions
Collection of G:AR cards

User avatar
GathersIngredients
Discussion Moderator
Posts: 5148

Re: 09-Aug-2015: Shching-thump

Post by GathersIngredients » Wed Aug 12, 2015 12:35 am

Sessine wrote:It's called unarmed combat. Hands and feet are permanent parts of the body.
hrm, how do you move your hands without arms? :lol: SCNR.


Anyways. I just noticed how the axe of prissan didn't change color when either THAC0 or Complains were holding it. Is that WAI (working as intended), because BE still owns the axe so it remains his IME color, no matter who is holding it currently or is that unintentional?

also, I would have been VERY tempted to title this thread "therapeutic". Not sure if that would have been too spoiler-ish. :shrug:
Krulle wrote:My bad memory allows me to enjoy positive news far more often!
Excited for the Dungeon Eyes, Ricki and Lara kissing!
► Show Spoiler

User avatar
Changes_everything
Pipes Up Sometimes
Posts: 182

Re: 09-Aug-2015: Shching-thump

Post by Changes_everything » Wed Aug 12, 2015 2:28 am

Citing the punch line would have been a bit spoilerish, yeah...

Morgaln
Likes to Contribute
Posts: 243

Re: 09-Aug-2015: Shching-thump

Post by Morgaln » Wed Aug 12, 2015 3:37 am

Kamos wrote:Doesn't he have blind fighting in the very least? :lol:
Zathyr wrote:But Thaco went blind (as in the blindfold worked like a blindfold) just touching the Axe of Prissan. He didn't even pick it up and it didn't look like he was intending to use it. Looked more like he was just resting his hand on the handle. :shrug:
He still thinks it's a weapon while he's holding it, the only real qualifier for blindness. Which is why Minmax couldn't use it even if his sword is nothing. He still thinks he has a weapon.
The way I can see it is your hands and feet are just 'you', even when you attack you're hitting them with yourself. The axe and sword are 'weapons'. A kitchen knife is different in that's a 'tool' until you go to stab someone. Then, consciously or not, it becomes a 'weapon'.

Fun fact, even if it's not super relevant, 5th Edition actually released new errata going to great lengths to disqualify unarmed strikes from weapon status :P.
Well, technically you can define an axe as a tool used for woodcutting. As long as Big Ears can convince himself he's not using it as a weapon (like, defining combat as "pruning undesired growth"), he should be able to use one of the blindfolds.

User avatar
HerdsCats
Of Few Words
Posts: 96
UStream Username: HerdsCats
Location: Somewhere between a tub and a sharp pointy set of teeth

Re: 09-Aug-2015: Shching-thump

Post by HerdsCats » Wed Aug 12, 2015 5:19 am

GathersIngredients wrote:
Sessine wrote:It's called unarmed combat. Hands and feet are permanent parts of the body.
hrm, how do you move your hands without arms? :lol: SCNR.


Anyways. I just noticed how the axe of prissan didn't change color when either THAC0 or Complains were holding it. Is that WAI (working as intended), because BE still owns the axe so it remains his IME color, no matter who is holding it currently or is that unintentional?

also, I would have been VERY tempted to title this thread "therapeutic". Not sure if that would have been too spoiler-ish. :shrug:

Yeah, it didn't change color because he still owns it. In the feed Thunt said that his eyes will continue to glow for that reason as well. If somebody else claims the axe, BE would lose the glow and the axe would change color.
My name is HerdsCats. I do the impossible, improbable, and downright unpleasant on a daily basis. How may I help you today?

User avatar
Krulle
Transcribes Goblins
Posts: 8119
Contact:

Re: 09-Aug-2015: Shching-thump

Post by Krulle » Wed Aug 12, 2015 8:15 am

GathersIngredients wrote:also, I would have been VERY tempted to title this thread "therapeutic". Not sure if that would have been too spoiler-ish. :shrug:
It's Sara puked it!!
Goblinscomic transcriptions
Collection of G:AR cards

User avatar
Kamos
Pipes Up Sometimes
Posts: 169

Re: 09-Aug-2015: Shching-thump

Post by Kamos » Wed Aug 12, 2015 9:14 am

Morgaln wrote:Well, technically you can define an axe as a tool used for woodcutting. As long as Big Ears can convince himself he's not using it as a weapon (like, defining combat as "pruning undesired growth"), he should be able to use one of the blindfolds.
It's a little late in life to be restructuring his thought process. Might work during a bout of insanity though, who knows.
ImageImage Feed the beast please.

User avatar
Arch Lich Burns
Will NOT Shut Up!
Posts: 17412
UStream Username: burnsbees
Location: Behind you
Contact:

Re: 09-Aug-2015: Shching-thump

Post by Arch Lich Burns » Wed Aug 12, 2015 1:17 pm

And what about a golem with sword hands? Or monster with claws? What is the line between weapon and not a weapon?

Morgaln
Likes to Contribute
Posts: 243

Re: 09-Aug-2015: Shching-thump

Post by Morgaln » Wed Aug 12, 2015 2:37 pm

Arch Lich Burns wrote:And what about a golem with sword hands? Or monster with claws? What is the line between weapon and not a weapon?
Or what about boots and gauntlets? What if those boots and gauntlets have spikes? You're still technically attacking with your hands and feet. Boxing gloves? Boxing gloves with barbed wire? Boxing gloves with a horseshoe inside? The definition of weapon can be very vague and arbitrary. Speaking from an RP point of view, this kind of vague limitation is a feast day for ingenious players and a nightmare for GMs.

User avatar
HerdsCats
Of Few Words
Posts: 96
UStream Username: HerdsCats
Location: Somewhere between a tub and a sharp pointy set of teeth

Re: 09-Aug-2015: Shching-thump

Post by HerdsCats » Wed Aug 12, 2015 3:01 pm

Morgaln wrote:
Arch Lich Burns wrote:And what about a golem with sword hands? Or monster with claws? What is the line between weapon and not a weapon?
Or what about boots and gauntlets? What if those boots and gauntlets have spikes? You're still technically attacking with your hands and feet. Boxing gloves? Boxing gloves with barbed wire? Boxing gloves with a horseshoe inside? The definition of weapon can be very vague and arbitrary. Speaking from an RP point of view, this kind of vague limitation is a feast day for ingenious players and a nightmare for GMs.

Again, this is where the "intent of the player" comes into play. Boots and gauntlets are probably ok, but adding spikes to them to do more damage would probably make them "weapons" in intent.
My name is HerdsCats. I do the impossible, improbable, and downright unpleasant on a daily basis. How may I help you today?

User avatar
Arch Lich Burns
Will NOT Shut Up!
Posts: 17412
UStream Username: burnsbees
Location: Behind you
Contact:

Re: 09-Aug-2015: Shching-thump

Post by Arch Lich Burns » Wed Aug 12, 2015 3:39 pm

Not if they are naturally mutated via magic they aren't weapons. Also what about horns? Or forgoth's helment? Or teeth?

What about polymorph hydras? Or regular hydras? Or bags of devouring?

User avatar
thinkslogically
Game Master
Posts: 17223
Location: Florida

Re: 09-Aug-2015: Shching-thump

Post by thinkslogically » Thu Aug 13, 2015 2:04 am

Does this not all come down to whether the player is about to make an attack or not? They declare an attack, declare what they're attacking with and we go to the stats...

I assumed thaco's blindness was artistic licence in the comic so that they could work out how the blindfolds work. Anyone else could have figured it out in a turn or two, without random axe touching but this way is quicker and keeps the story moving.

Morgaln
Likes to Contribute
Posts: 243

Re: 09-Aug-2015: Shching-thump

Post by Morgaln » Thu Aug 13, 2015 5:57 am

If the intent was to keep the story moving, it would have been better to build the revelation into the fight scene with the statues. Thaco could easily have picked up some discarded weapon during that fight and discovered the limitation that way. That would have made for a more dynamic and dramatic tie-in into the story. It's not even unrealistic, since until a short while ago, Thaco was carrying weapons and is therefore used to fighting with them instead of his hands and feet.

Talos
Pipes Up Sometimes
Posts: 185

Re: 09-Aug-2015: Shching-thump

Post by Talos » Thu Aug 13, 2015 6:04 pm

He'd better have some weak enemies, then. Uncovered, human-child-sized hands and feet won't do much damage compared to his previous weapons.

And Big Ears might want to turn that armor on again pretty quickly. Given what this dungeon likely has, he will need it.

User avatar
Guus
Floods your Ears
Posts: 2131
Location: Beneath sea level

Re: 09-Aug-2015: Shching-thump

Post by Guus » Fri Aug 14, 2015 12:16 am

I dunno, 4th has monk unarmed strike, that one's pretty brutal. +3 proficiency, 1d8 dmg. 1d10 with just one feat. I suspect 3.something to have roughly the same.
I feel smart, but I'm pretty sure I'm an idiot.

User avatar
lingrem
Former Mod
Posts: 3947
Location: North of the Middle of Nowhere.

Re: 09-Aug-2015: Shching-thump

Post by lingrem » Fri Aug 14, 2015 8:23 am

Totally ignoring all conversation to add in my only real thought reading this page:

Where are the statues? How did that much conversation go on without them? Did they all get taken out the page before and I somehow missed that?? lol

ETA: Looking at it... yeah maybe he did. I just thought he only took out a few of them.
Felicia Faustus in Shipwrecked!

User avatar
Zathyr
Smiths Silly Smiles
Posts: 3199
UStream Username: Zathyr

Re: 09-Aug-2015: Shching-thump

Post by Zathyr » Fri Aug 14, 2015 11:36 am

Guus wrote:I dunno, 4th has monk unarmed strike, that one's pretty brutal. +3 proficiency, 1d8 dmg. 1d10 with just one feat. I suspect 3.something to have roughly the same.
3.x, there's the Improved Unarmed Strike feat (which Minmax has) but it just lets you do lethal damage and not provoke attacks of opportunity - doesn't up the damage. He still does a d3 + strength modifier, and any other modifiers like power attack so Minmax still does a lot of damage with his unarmed strikes even though the base die is just a d3. Monks get a better version, which starts at a d6 (d4 for small creatures, like Thaco) and scales up with more class levels.
Image And always make sure your dragons are happy little dragons.

User avatar
Krulle
Transcribes Goblins
Posts: 8119
Contact:

Re: 09-Aug-2015: Shching-thump

Post by Krulle » Fri Aug 14, 2015 1:57 pm

lingrem wrote:Totally ignoring all conversation to add in my only real thought reading this page:

Where are the statues? How did that much conversation go on without them? Did they all get taken out the page before and I somehow missed that?? lol

ETA: Looking at it... yeah maybe he did. I just thought he only took out a few of them.
I thought the same, but since there are now two opponents to fight, the have to draw new numbers, thus the pause...
Goblinscomic transcriptions
Collection of G:AR cards

User avatar
Generic
Converses Frequently
Posts: 700

Re: 09-Aug-2015: Shching-thump

Post by Generic » Fri Aug 14, 2015 2:50 pm

lingrem wrote:Totally ignoring all conversation to add in my only real thought reading this page:

Where are the statues? How did that much conversation go on without them? Did they all get taken out the page before and I somehow missed that?? lol

ETA: Looking at it... yeah maybe he did. I just thought he only took out a few of them.
Yeah. Got a bit of a storytelling whiplash there. Fight is over? Ceiling full of dead gals should just have slowmotion danced and gone full out jedi to survive. That's all?
You won't sleep when you're dead either.

Post Reply